ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT vs HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) with Radeon HD 2400 XT, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
2016
0.42
+50%

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) outperforms HD 2400 XT by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13181401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.86
ArchitectureGen. 8 (2015−2016)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBraswellRV610
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2016 (9 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1240
Core clock speed320 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data180 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.052 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.210.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+60%
5−6
−60%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) and ATI HD 2400 XT compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is 60% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.28
Recency 1 April 2016 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm

HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) has a 50% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2400 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2400 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)
ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
Radeon HD 2400 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 257 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2400 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) or Radeon HD 2400 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.