ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs HD Graphics 3000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11931534
Place by popularity93not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+RV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed650 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,160 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown28 Watt
Texture fill rate15.600.8
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)8.1
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.11.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 3000 254
+12600%
ATI 9200 SE 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 3 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Fortnite 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data
World of Tanks 11 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 7 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data
World of Tanks 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Valorant 5−6 no data

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 14−16 no data
Valorant 1−2 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 1 March 2003
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm

HD Graphics 3000 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 3000 and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2511 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.