Quadro P4200 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 with Quadro P4200, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

P4200 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 3715% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1187214
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data17.27
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+GP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962304
Core clock speed650 MHz1227 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1647 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown100 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60237.2
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPS7.589 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs12144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66
Quadro P4200 25.18
+3715%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 3000 254
Quadro P4200 10544
+4051%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−3650%
300−350
+3650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−955%
110−120
+955%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−243%
100−110
+243%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−6500%
65−70
+6500%
Hitman 3 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−955%
110−120
+955%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−440%
50−55
+440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−243%
100−110
+243%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Hitman 3 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−955%
110−120
+955%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−440%
50−55
+440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−243%
100−110
+243%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 24−27
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−1633%
50−55
+1633%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−7000%
140−150
+7000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 14−16

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Hitman 3 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and Quadro P4200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 3650% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 7000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 25.18
Recency 1 February 2011 21 February 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 16 nm

Quadro P4200 has a 3715.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2440 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.