Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.61

RX 7900 XTX outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 11490% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking122916
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.06
Power efficiencyno data16.03
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (13 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores486144
Core clock speed650 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2498 MHz
Number of transistors392 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown355 Watt
Texture fill rate6.900959.2
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs1192
TMUs6384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96
L0 Cacheno data3 MB
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data287 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data960.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 2500 0.61
RX 7900 XTX 70.70
+11490%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 2500 351
RX 7900 XTX 84792
+24092%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2500 1931
RX 7900 XTX 150207
+7681%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 2500 318
RX 7900 XTX 66743
+20888%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 2500 2605
RX 7900 XTX 250728
+9527%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−2900%
240
+2900%
1440p1−2
−15800%
159
+15800%
4K0−1100

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.16
1440pno data6.28
4Kno data9.99

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−12400%
250
+12400%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−3533%
218
+3533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−11900%
240
+11900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−21100%
212
+21100%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6660%
338
+6660%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−3000%
186
+3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
Valorant 27−30
−1490%
450−500
+1490%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12
−2217%
270−280
+2217%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10750%
217
+10750%
Dota 2 12−14
−1542%
197
+1542%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−20400%
205
+20400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6500%
330
+6500%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2617%
163
+2617%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−23800%
239
+23800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8983%
545
+8983%
Valorant 27−30
−1490%
450−500
+1490%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10250%
207
+10250%
Dota 2 12−14
−1383%
178
+1383%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−18800%
189
+18800%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−5800%
295
+5800%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2500%
156
+2500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4867%
298
+4867%
Valorant 27−30
−1490%
450−500
+1490%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−8800%
267
+8800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−17100%
500−550
+17100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2817%
170−180
+2817%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 146
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−14400%
290
+14400%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 128
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−23700%
238
+23700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−15000%
150−160
+15000%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1140%
186
+1140%
Valorant 3−4
−10900%
300−350
+10900%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 355
+0%
355
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 348
+0%
348
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 269
+0%
269
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 339
+0%
339
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 254
+0%
254
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 175
+0%
175
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 165
+0%
165
+0%
Metro Exodus 161
+0%
161
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Far Cry 5 187
+0%
187
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 108
+0%
108
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 197
+0%
197
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 43
+0%
43
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Dota 2 159
+0%
159
+0%
Far Cry 5 159
+0%
159
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 227
+0%
227
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 69
+0%
69
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and RX 7900 XTX compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX is 2900% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XTX is 15800% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7900 XTX is 23800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XTX performs better in 36 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 70.70
Recency 1 April 2012 3 November 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 5 nm

RX 7900 XTX has a 11490.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XTX is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1547 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4800 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or Radeon RX 7900 XTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.