Radeon Pro W6900X vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with Radeon Pro W6900X, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.67

Pro W6900X outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 6394% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking119581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.14
Power efficiencyno data10.27
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)3 August 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores485120
Core clock speed650 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2150 MHz
Number of transistors392 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown300 Watt
Texture fill rate6.900688.0
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS22.02 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUs6320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGPQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.801.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−6150%
500−550
+6150%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data10.00

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
Valorant 27−30
−6279%
1850−1900
+6279%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12
−6150%
750−800
+6150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Dota 2 12−14
−6150%
750−800
+6150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
Valorant 27−30
−6279%
1850−1900
+6279%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Dota 2 12−14
−6150%
750−800
+6150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
Valorant 27−30
−6279%
1850−1900
+6279%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6233%
950−1000
+6233%
Valorant 4−5
−6150%
250−260
+6150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and Pro W6900X compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6900X is 6150% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 43.51
Recency 1 April 2012 3 August 2021
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm

Pro W6900X has a 6394% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6900X is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop card while Radeon Pro W6900X is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon Pro W6900X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1486 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 67 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6900X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or Radeon Pro W6900X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.