ATI Radeon HD 4810 vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 and Radeon HD 4810, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.60

ATI HD 4810 outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1192908
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.44
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1RV770
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)28 May 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48640
Core clock speed650 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown95 Watt
Texture fill rate6.90020.00
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS0.8 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data246 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.03.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−163%
21−24
+163%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Valorant 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Valorant 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Dota 2 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Valorant 27−30
−176%
80−85
+176%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Valorant 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and ATI HD 4810 compete in popular games:

  • ATI HD 4810 is 163% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 1.72
Recency 1 April 2012 28 May 2009
Chip lithography 22 nm 55 nm

HD Graphics 2500 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4810, on the other hand, has a 186.7% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 4810 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
ATI Radeon HD 4810
Radeon HD 4810

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1471 vote

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 22 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or Radeon HD 4810, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.