P102-100 vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with P102-100, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.69

P102-100 outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 1007% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1186537
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.30
Power efficiencyno data2.10
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1GP102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2012 (12 years ago)12 February 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483200
Core clock speed650 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1683 MHz
Number of transistors392 million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown250 Watt
Texture fill rate6.900336.6
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS10.77 TFLOPS
ROPs180
TMUs6200

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared5 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared320 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1376 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data440.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.801.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−963%
85−90
+963%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Valorant 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12
−983%
130−140
+983%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Dota 2 12−14
−983%
130−140
+983%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Valorant 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Dota 2 12−14
−983%
130−140
+983%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Valorant 27−30
−934%
300−310
+934%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−967%
160−170
+967%
Valorant 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and P102-100 compete in popular games:

  • P102-100 is 963% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.69 7.64
Recency 1 April 2012 12 February 2018
Chip lithography 22 nm 16 nm

P102-100 has a 1007.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

The P102-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop card while P102-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1458 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 34 votes

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or P102-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.