GeForce2 MX vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11961545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1NV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (13 years ago)28 June 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed650 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate6.9000.7
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPSno data
ROPs12
TMUs64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.01.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 no data
Far Cry 5 4−5 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 no data

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 4−5 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2012 28 June 2000
Chip lithography 22 nm 180 nm

HD Graphics 2500 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 718.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 2500 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1490 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 26 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.