GeForce 9400M vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 with GeForce 9400M, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.64
+167%

HD Graphics 2500 outperforms 9400M by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12401421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.54
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 2012 (13 years ago)15 October 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4816
Core clock speed650 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown12 Watt
Texture fill rate6.9004.640
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUs68

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.03.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+167%
3−4
−167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Valorant 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12
+200%
4−5
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Valorant 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and GeForce 9400M compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 2500 is 167% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 0.24
Recency 1 April 2012 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm

HD Graphics 2500 has a 166.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 2500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2500 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9400M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2500
HD Graphics 2500
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1566 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 52 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or GeForce 9400M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.