UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs HD Graphics 2000

Place in the ranking	1224	758
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	8.68
Architecture	Generation 6.0 (2011)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Sandy Bridge GT1	Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 February 2011 (14 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	32
Core clock speed	850 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.100	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.1296 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	1	no data
TMUs	6	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

PCIe 1.0 x16

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12_1
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	3.1	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2000 0.55

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.11
+465%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2000 896

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 8750
+877%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	11 −18.2%	13 +18.2%
4K	1−2 −800%	9 +800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +100%	3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −20%	6 +20%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
Fortnite	0−1	18−20
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −83.3%	11 +83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −300%	32 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
World of Tanks	16−18 −87.5%	30 +87.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −50%	12 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −117%	13 +117%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −263%	27−30 +263%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −633%	21−24 +633%
World of Tanks	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Valorant	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	2−3
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +66.7%	9 −66.7%
Valorant	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Metro Exodus	8 +0%	8 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	7 +0%	7 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Dota 2	20 +0%	20 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
High Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

+0%

2−3

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Fortnite	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 18% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 2000 is 100% faster.
in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

HD Graphics 2000 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 28 tests (47%)
there's a draw in 29 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.55	3.11
Recency	1 February 2011	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	32 nm	10 nm

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 465.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.