Radeon Pro W6600M vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.48

Pro W6600M outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 5219% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1276238
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.84
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2011 (14 years ago)8 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481792
Core clock speed850 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2034 MHz
Number of transistors189 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown90 Watt
Texture fill rate8.100227.8
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs6112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 2000 0.48
Pro W6600M 25.53
+5219%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 2000 213
Samples: 1
Pro W6600M 11287
+5199%
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−4900%
550−600
+4900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2060%
100−110
+2060%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1263%
100−110
+1263%
Valorant 27−30
−543%
180−190
+543%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1482%
260−270
+1482%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Dota 2 10−12
−1073%
120−130
+1073%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2060%
100−110
+2060%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
Metro Exodus 0−1 60−65
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1263%
100−110
+1263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Valorant 27−30
−543%
180−190
+543%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%
Dota 2 10−12
−1073%
120−130
+1073%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2060%
100−110
+2060%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1263%
100−110
+1263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Valorant 27−30
−543%
180−190
+543%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1967%
60−65
+1967%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−9550%
190−200
+9550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 65−70

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−253%
50−55
+253%
Valorant 3−4
−5367%
160−170
+5367%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1450%
30−35
+1450%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 4900% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 9550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M performs better in 31 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.48 25.53
Recency 1 February 2011 8 June 2021
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm

Pro W6600M has a 5218.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1438 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2000 or Radeon Pro W6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.