GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs HD Graphics 2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 and GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.55

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 9156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking121654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data30.35
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1AD106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484608
Core clock speed850 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown115 Watt
Texture fill rate8.100244.1
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs148
TMUs6144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2000 0.55
RTX 4070 Mobile 50.91
+9156%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 2000 213
RTX 4070 Mobile 19619
+9111%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2000 896
RTX 4070 Mobile 94245
+10424%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10
−1200%
130
+1200%
1440p0−175
4K-0−146

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−6550%
133
+6550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5700%
116
+5700%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2325%
95−100
+2325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2175%
180−190
+2175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4150%
170−180
+4150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−386%
130−140
+386%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4800%
98
+4800%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2325%
95−100
+2325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2175%
180−190
+2175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5725%
233
+5725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−386%
130−140
+386%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3067%
95−100
+3067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4250%
87
+4250%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2325%
95−100
+2325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2188%
183
+2188%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5000%
204
+5000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1189%
116
+1189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−218%
89
+218%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 54
Hitman 3 6−7
−900%
60−65
+900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−7050%
143
+7050%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3100%
30−35
+3100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 42

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+0%
75
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134
+0%
134
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+0%
88
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70
+0%
70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 73
+0%
73
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+0%
33
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and RTX 4070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 1200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Mobile is 7050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 50.91
Recency 1 February 2011 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm

RTX 4070 Mobile has a 9156.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1326 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1771 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.