RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs H100 SXM5

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated29
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.44
ArchitectureHopper (2022−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGH100AD104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 March 2022 (2 years ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84486144
Core clock speed1065 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1780 MHz2175 MHz
Number of transistors80,000 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)700 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate939.8417.6
Floating-point processing power30.07 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs2480
TMUs528192
Tensor Cores528192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount80 GB20 GB
Memory bus width5120 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,920 GB/s360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA9.08.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2022 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 80 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 700 Watt 130 Watt

H100 SXM5 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 438.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between H100 SXM5 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA H100 SXM5
H100 SXM5
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 27 votes

Rate H100 SXM5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.