Radeon RX Vega M vs ATI Graphics Ultra +

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data80.06
Architectureno dataGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMach32Vega
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 1992 (33 years ago)1 February 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed10 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data38.08
ROPs18
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1992 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 800 nm 14 nm

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 26 years, and a 5614.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra + and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +
AMD Radeon RX Vega M
Radeon RX Vega M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra + or Radeon RX Vega M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.