ATI Graphics Ultra + vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking673not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.97no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameRavenMach32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (7 years ago)1 January 1992 (33 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704no data
Core clock speed300 MHz10 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm800 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate55.04no data
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs44no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDRAM
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared10 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard Dependent1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)None
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL2.1None
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2018 1 January 1992
Chip lithography 14 nm 800 nm

RX Vega 11 has an age advantage of 26 years, and a 5614.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 11 and Graphics Ultra +. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
ATI Graphics Ultra +
Graphics Ultra +

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 2011 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 11 or Graphics Ultra +, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.