GeForce G 110M vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Gen. 5 Arrandale (2010)	G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code name	GMA HD	N10M-GS1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)	8 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	12	16
Core clock speed	500 MHz	400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	14 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	no data	1 GB
Memory bus width	no data	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	700 MHz
Shared memory	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

10

10

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	10 January 2010	8 January 2009
Chip lithography	45 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	14 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---