UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GeForce FX Go 5200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce FX Go 5200 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) outperforms FX Go 5200 by a whopping 5850% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1551 | 1067 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 9.62 |
Architecture | no data | Gen. 11 (2021) |
GPU code name | NV31M | Gen. 11 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 March 2003 (22 years ago) | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 4.8 - 10 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | no data |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DDR | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | -0−1 | 8 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 3−4 |
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
Full HD
Medium
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 3−4 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
Valorant | 21−24
−43.5%
|
30−35
+43.5%
|
Full HD
High
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−100%
|
18
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 3−4 |
Dota 2 | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12
+71.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
Valorant | 21−24
−43.5%
|
30−35
+43.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 3−4 |
Dota 2 | 7−8
−57.1%
|
11
+57.1%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
Valorant | 21−24
−43.5%
|
30−35
+43.5%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 12−14 |
1440p
Ultra
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
High
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K
Ultra
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Fortnite | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Fortnite | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 3
+0%
|
3
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Valorant | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
Dota 2 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) performs better in 22 tests (51%)
- there's a draw in 21 tests (49%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.02 | 1.19 |
Recency | 1 March 2003 | 11 January 2021 |
Chip lithography | 150 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has a 5850% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.