UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GeForce FX Go 5200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce FX Go 5200 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) outperforms FX Go 5200 by a whopping 6550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1495 | 1015 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.59 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 11 (2021) |
| GPU code name | NV31M | Gen. 11 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 March 2003 (21 year ago) | 11 January 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 4.8 - 10 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 8 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−40%
|
7
+40%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−33.3%
|
8
+33.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−20%
|
6
+20%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−75%
|
7−8
+75%
|
| World of Tanks | 8−9
−125%
|
18
+125%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7−8
+16.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−80%
|
9−10
+80%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 8−9 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−25%
|
5−6
+25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 1−2 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3
+0%
|
3
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| World of Tanks | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 275% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is ahead in 24 tests (57%)
- there's a draw in 18 tests (43%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.02 | 1.33 |
| Recency | 1 March 2003 | 11 January 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has a 6550% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
