Tesla S1070 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 3 (2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGMA 950GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2005 (20 years ago)1 June 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4240 ×4
Core clock speedno data610 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.80 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPsno data32 ×4
TMUsno data80 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB ×4
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2005 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 130 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 800 Watt

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 has 11328.6% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 and Tesla S1070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla S1070 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950
NVIDIA Tesla S1070
Tesla S1070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 9 votes

Rate Tesla S1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 or Tesla S1070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.