Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.56
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePineviewTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date10 January 2010 (15 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2896
Core clock speedno data765 MHz
Boost clock speed200 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors123 Million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data75.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.419 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm

T1000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 and Quadro T1000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 353 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 18 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 or Quadro T1000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.