RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMontevinaAD103
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores109728
Core clock speed640 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data510.7
Floating-point processing powerno data32.69 TFLOPS
ROPsno data112
TMUsno data304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD is a notebook graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.