Radeon 890M vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data100.00
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025)
GPU code nameCedar TrailStrix Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)15 July 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores41024
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data185.6
Floating-point processing powerno data5.939 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 15 July 2024
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm

Radeon 890M has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 and Radeon 890M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
AMD Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 27 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 207 votes

Rate Radeon 890M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 or Radeon 890M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.