Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023
9.46

RX 9060 XT 8 GB outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 411% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking48072
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data96.32
Power efficiencyno data24.56
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUNavi 44
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)4 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42048
Core clock speedno data1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHz3130 MHz
Number of transistorsno data29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data400.6
Floating-point processing powerno data25.64 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−380%
120−130
+380%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 13
−400%
65−70
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−400%
210−220
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 11
−400%
55−60
+400%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−384%
150−160
+384%
Forza Horizon 4 50
−400%
250−260
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−383%
140−150
+383%
God of War 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−400%
170−180
+400%
Valorant 90−95
−389%
450−500
+389%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−400%
210−220
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 13
−400%
65−70
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Far Cry 5 24
−400%
120−130
+400%
Fortnite 55−60
−400%
290−300
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 39
−387%
190−200
+387%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−383%
140−150
+383%
God of War 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−400%
75−80
+400%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−400%
170−180
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−380%
120−130
+380%
Valorant 90−95
−389%
450−500
+389%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−400%
210−220
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
−400%
260−270
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−384%
150−160
+384%
Fortnite 55−60
−400%
290−300
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−400%
150−160
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−383%
140−150
+383%
God of War 18−20
−400%
95−100
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−400%
170−180
+400%
Valorant 90−95
−389%
450−500
+389%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−379%
350−400
+379%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−410%
250−260
+410%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−400%
120−130
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−400%
90−95
+400%
Far Cry 5 20−22
−400%
100−105
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
God of War 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Valorant 100−110
−372%
500−550
+372%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−376%
100−105
+376%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−400%
60−65
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Fortnite 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
God of War 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Valorant 50−55
−400%
250−260
+400%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RX 9060 XT 8 GB compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT 8 GB is 380% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.46 48.36
Recency 14 December 2023 4 June 2025
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT 8 GB has a 411.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 14 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 89 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.