Radeon RX 7600 XT vs Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) with Radeon RX 7600 XT, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023
9.75

RX 7600 XT outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking45078
Place by popularitynot in top-10096
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data79.15
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)RDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUNavi 33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42048
Boost clock speed1950 MHz2755 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data190 Watt
Texture fill rateno data352.6
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data204 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data18 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−340%
110−120
+340%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−355%
100−105
+355%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−344%
120−130
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−362%
300−310
+362%
Hitman 3 18−20
−344%
80−85
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−344%
240−250
+344%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−352%
140−150
+352%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−344%
120−130
+344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−338%
140−150
+338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−352%
280−290
+352%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−333%
130−140
+333%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−355%
100−105
+355%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−344%
120−130
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−362%
300−310
+362%
Hitman 3 18−20
−344%
80−85
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−344%
240−250
+344%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−352%
140−150
+352%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−344%
120−130
+344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−362%
180−190
+362%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−362%
120−130
+362%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−352%
280−290
+352%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−335%
100−105
+335%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−355%
100−105
+355%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−362%
300−310
+362%
Hitman 3 18−20
−344%
80−85
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−344%
240−250
+344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−333%
130−140
+333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−338%
70−75
+338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−352%
280−290
+352%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−344%
120−130
+344%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−347%
85−90
+347%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−333%
65−70
+333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−342%
190−200
+342%
Hitman 3 12−14
−362%
60−65
+362%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−352%
280−290
+352%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−338%
70−75
+338%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Hitman 3 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−339%
180−190
+339%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−358%
55−60
+358%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%

This is how Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and RX 7600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600 XT is 340% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.75 45.01
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

RX 7600 XT, on the other hand, has a 361.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon RX 7600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
Radeon RX 7600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 382 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.