ATI Radeon X700 SE vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) with Radeon X700 SE, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
2025
9.96
+5759%

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) outperforms X700 SE by a whopping 5759% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4861473
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023−2025)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameno dataRV410
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)1 April 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data120 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data110 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.600
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data128 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 48 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 24 0−1
Fortnite 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
Valorant 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 22 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+7450%
2−3
−7450%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 22 0−1
Fortnite 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 0−1
Metro Exodus 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 0−1
Valorant 95−100
+9400%
1−2
−9400%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 0−1
Far Cry 5 21 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+7600%
1−2
−7600%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−12 0−1
Valorant 110−120
+11000%
1−2
−11000%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1
Valorant 50−55 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.96 0.17
Recency 6 January 2025 1 April 2005

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) has a 5758.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 19 years.

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X700 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X700 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
ATI Radeon X700 SE
Radeon X700 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 10 votes

Rate Radeon X700 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) or Radeon X700 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.