ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) and Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) outperforms Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire by an impressive 98% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 522 | 698 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.03 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023−2025) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | Broadway-XT |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) | 7 January 2010 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1950 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 120 Watt |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2x1 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1000 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 11 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 100−110
+88.7%
| 53
−88.7%
|
| Full HD | 20
−170%
| 54
+170%
|
| 1440p | 6
+100%
| 3−4
−100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50
+138%
|
21−24
−138%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 18−20
+157%
|
7−8
−157%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+116%
|
18−20
−116%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 48
+129%
|
21−24
−129%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
+71.4%
|
14−16
−71.4%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+100%
|
27−30
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+86.4%
|
21−24
−86.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+123%
|
12−14
−123%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+78.9%
|
18−20
−78.9%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+52.5%
|
55−60
−52.5%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+116%
|
18−20
−116%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 22
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+74.4%
|
80−85
−74.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 22
+57.1%
|
14−16
−57.1%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+100%
|
27−30
−100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+86.4%
|
21−24
−86.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+123%
|
12−14
−123%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+111%
|
9−10
−111%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+78.9%
|
18−20
−78.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30
+131%
|
12−14
−131%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+52.5%
|
55−60
−52.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+116%
|
18−20
−116%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21
+50%
|
14−16
−50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+86.4%
|
21−24
−86.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+78.9%
|
18−20
−78.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16
+23.1%
|
12−14
−23.1%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
+100%
|
27−30
−100%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+88.9%
|
9−10
−88.9%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+100%
|
35−40
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+233%
|
3−4
−233%
|
| Valorant | 95−100
+102%
|
45−50
−102%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+475%
|
4−5
−475%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+122%
|
9−10
−122%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+100%
|
10−12
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22
+122%
|
9−10
−122%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+25%
|
16−18
−25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+900%
|
1−2
−900%
|
| Valorant | 40−45
+110%
|
20−22
−110%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+1000%
|
1−2
−1000%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+125%
|
4−5
−125%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+167%
|
6−7
−167%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+80%
|
5−6
−80%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Valorant | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
High
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
This is how Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) and ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire compete in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is 89% faster in 900p
- ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire is 170% faster in 1080p
- Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is 100% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is 1000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) performs better in 51 tests (89%)
- there's a draw in 6 tests (11%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.37 | 4.73 |
| Recency | 6 January 2025 | 7 January 2010 |
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) has a 98% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 14 years.
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
