Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) outperforms Graphics G7 96EUs by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 496 | 536 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 23.16 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1950 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12_1 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 22
−22.7%
| 27
+22.7%
|
| 1440p | 16−18
+6.7%
| 15
−6.7%
|
| 4K | 12−14
+0%
| 12
+0%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+13.3%
|
45−50
−13.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+2.4%
|
41
−2.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+13.3%
|
45−50
−13.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16
−18.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
−8.3%
|
26
+8.3%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+90%
|
30
−90%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+7.9%
|
35−40
−7.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−20.7%
|
35
+20.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+9.7%
|
30−35
−9.7%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−34.8%
|
124
+34.8%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+20%
|
35
−20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+13.3%
|
45−50
−13.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+50%
|
96
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+46.2%
|
13
−46.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 22
−13.6%
|
25
+13.6%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+171%
|
21
−171%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+7.9%
|
35−40
−7.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
−6.9%
|
31
+6.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
−13.3%
|
17
+13.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+9.7%
|
30−35
−9.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30
+0%
|
30
+0%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
−21.7%
|
112
+21.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+40%
|
30
−40%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+72.7%
|
11
−72.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21
−9.5%
|
23
+9.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+7.9%
|
35−40
−7.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+9.7%
|
30−35
−9.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16
+14.3%
|
14
−14.3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60
+280%
|
15
−280%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16−18
−12.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+10.6%
|
65−70
−10.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+85.7%
|
7
−85.7%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+9.4%
|
95−100
−9.4%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+15%
|
20−22
−15%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+25%
|
16
−25%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+15%
|
20−22
−15%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+150%
|
8
−150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12
+9.1%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+13.6%
|
40−45
−13.6%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+20%
|
10−11
−20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+14.3%
|
14−16
−14.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
Full HD
Low
| Hogwarts Legacy | 28
+0%
|
28
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Dota 2 | 51
+0%
|
51
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 47
+0%
|
47
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 8
+0%
|
8
+0%
|
| Valorant | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Hogwarts Legacy | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
4K
High
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 20
+0%
|
20
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
This is how Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 23% faster in 1080p
- Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is 7% faster in 1440p
- A tie in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Epic Preset, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is 280% faster.
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 35% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) performs better in 39 tests (59%)
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs performs better in 9 tests (14%)
- there's a draw in 18 tests (27%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.90 | 8.01 |
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 10 nm |
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
