GeForce 6100 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) with GeForce 6100, including specs and performance data.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
2023
9.39
+15550%

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) outperforms 6100 by a whopping 15550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4971533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUC51
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)11 October 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4no data
Core clock speed300 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm90 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.43
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1
L1 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 24 0−1
Fortnite 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
Valorant 90−95 0−1

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 22 0−1
Fortnite 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 15 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 0−1
Valorant 90−95 0−1

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 35−40 0−1
Far Cry 5 21 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 0−1

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 0−1
Valorant 100−110 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22 0−1

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Valorant 50−55 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.39 0.06
Recency 14 December 2023 11 October 2004
Chip lithography 5 nm 90 nm

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has a 15550% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6100 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
NVIDIA GeForce 6100
GeForce 6100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 63 votes

Rate GeForce 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) or GeForce 6100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.