GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs GeForce4 Ti 4400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 Ti 4400 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 Ti 4400
2002
128 MB DDR
0.02

RTX 2070 Super outperforms Ti 4400 by a whopping 216950% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking155797
Place by popularitynot in top-10079
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.57
Power efficiencyno data15.51
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV25 A2TU104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)9 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed275 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors63 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data215 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200283.2
Floating-point processing powerno data9.062 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length216 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 Ti 4400 0.02
RTX 2070 Super 43.41
+216950%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 Ti 4400 7
Samples: 3
RTX 2070 Super 18165
+259400%
Samples: 17945

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1132
1440p-0−180
4K-0−152

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.78
1440pno data6.24
4Kno data9.60

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 341
+0%
341
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 94
+0%
94
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 316
+0%
316
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 123
+0%
123
+0%
Fortnite 218
+0%
218
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 174
+0%
174
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150
+0%
150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 186
+0%
186
+0%
Valorant 279
+0%
279
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 137
+0%
137
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 193
+0%
193
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 172
+0%
172
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 165
+0%
165
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+0%
181
+0%
Valorant 270
+0%
270
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+0%
73
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+0%
153
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 154
+0%
154
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Valorant 194
+0%
194
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 168
+0%
168
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 263
+0%
263
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 125
+0%
125
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 117
+0%
117
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%
Valorant 258
+0%
258
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 46
+0%
46
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+0%
84
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 66
+0%
66
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 58
+0%
58
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.02 43.41
Recency 6 February 2002 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

RTX 2070 Super has a 216950% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4400 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4400
GeForce4 Ti 4400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 69 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5888 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 Ti 4400 or GeForce RTX 2070 Super, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.