Radeon R7 M260DX vs GeForce4 488 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated867
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV17MJet
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2002 (22 years ago)7 January 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2320
Core clock speedno data925 MHz
Boost clock speed275 MHz855 MHz
Number of transistors29 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate1.20017.10
Floating-point performanceno data0.5472 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2002 7 January 2014
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R7 M260DX has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 488 Go and Radeon R7 M260DX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 488 Go is a notebook card while Radeon R7 M260DX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 488 Go
GeForce4 488 Go
AMD Radeon R7 M260DX
Radeon R7 M260DX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 488 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 18 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M260DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.