UHD Graphics 710 vs GeForce4 460 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 460 Go with UHD Graphics 710, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 460 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

Graphics 710 outperforms GeForce4 460 Go by a whopping 26200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1579859
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.50
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV17 A5Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2002 (23 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2128
Core clock speed250 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00010.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3328 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 460 Go 0.01
UHD Graphics 710 2.63
+26200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 460 Go 5
UHD Graphics 710 1100
+21900%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−24900%
500−550
+24900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−25733%
1550−1600
+25733%
Valorant 21−24
−25987%
6000−6050
+25987%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−26011%
2350−2400
+26011%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−25614%
1800−1850
+25614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−24900%
500−550
+24900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−25733%
1550−1600
+25733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−26150%
1050−1100
+26150%
Valorant 21−24
−25987%
6000−6050
+25987%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−25614%
1800−1850
+25614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−24900%
500−550
+24900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−25733%
1550−1600
+25733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−26150%
1050−1100
+26150%
Valorant 21−24
−25987%
6000−6050
+25987%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−24900%
500−550
+24900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−25900%
260−270
+25900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−25971%
3650−3700
+25971%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−25900%
260−270
+25900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−25900%
260−270
+25900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 2.63
Recency 14 October 2002 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 710 has a 26200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 460 Go is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 460 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 148 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 460 Go or UHD Graphics 710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.