Radeon 630 vs GeForce4 460 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
410 Go 420 Go 440 Go 448 Go 460 Go 488 Go
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610M 620 625 630 660M 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 460 Go and Radeon 630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 460 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

630 outperforms GeForce4 460 Go by a whopping 38200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce4 460 Go GeForce4 460 Go
Radeon 630 Radeon 630

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1579759
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data5.90
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A5Polaris 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 October 2002 (23 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2512
Core clock speed250 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHz1218 MHz
Number of transistors29 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00038.98
Floating-point processing powerno data1.247 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs432
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 460 Go 0.01
Radeon 630 3.83
+38200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 460 Go 5
Radeon 630 1619
+32280%
Samples: 29

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Valorant 21−24
−130%
50−55
+130%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−667%
65−70
+667%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Dota 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Valorant 21−24
−130%
50−55
+130%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 8−9
Dota 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Valorant 21−24
−130%
50−55
+130%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 30−35

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Valorant 0−1 18−20

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 630 is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 630 performs better in 19 tests (40%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (60%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 3.83
Recency 14 October 2002 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

Radeon 630 has a 38200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 460 Go in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce4 460 Go GeForce4 460 Go
vs
RX 490M Radeon RX 490M
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
GeForce4 460 Go GeForce4 460 Go
vs
HD 7430M Radeon HD 7430M
FX Go5650 GeForce FX Go5650
vs
A100 SXM4 80 GB A100 SXM4 80 GB
FX Go5650 GeForce FX Go5650
vs
L40 CNX L40 CNX
GeForce4 Go 4200 GeForce4 Go 4200
vs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 3 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GeForce4 460 Go GeForce4 460 Go
vs
ATI FireMV 2200 PCI FireMV 2200 PCI
GeForce4 460 Go GeForce4 460 Go
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce4 448 Go GeForce4 448 Go
vs
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce4 448 Go GeForce4 448 Go
vs
Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
GeForce4 448 Go GeForce4 448 Go
vs
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
GeForce4 448 Go GeForce4 448 Go
vs
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
GeForce4 488 Go GeForce4 488 Go
vs
A100 PCIe A100 PCIe

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

1 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 460 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 34 votes

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 460 Go or Radeon 630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.