RTX A2000 Embedded vs GeForce4 448 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 448 Go with RTX A2000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 448 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

RTX A2000 Embedded outperforms GeForce4 448 Go by a whopping 265700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1573244
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data58.48
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV18 A4GA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2002 (24 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed200 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1177 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate0.894.16
Floating-point processing powerno data6.026 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 448 Go 0.01
RTX A2000 Embedded 26.58
+265700%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 448 Go 5
Samples: 2
RTX A2000 Embedded 11117
+222240%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 26.58
Recency 1 March 2002 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX A2000 Embedded has a 265700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A2000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 448 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 448 Go is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 448 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 448 Go or RTX A2000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.