UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce4 440 Go
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce4 440 Go and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics G4 48EUs outperforms GeForce4 440 Go by a whopping 42700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1584 | 711 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 11.85 |
| Architecture | Celsius (1999−2005) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | NV17 A5 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 February 2002 (23 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 220 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 220 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 29 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 28 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.88 | no data |
| ROPs | 2 | no data |
| TMUs | 4 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 220 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 7.04 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 8.0 | 12_1 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 16 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 11 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−56.5%
|
36
+56.5%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−178%
|
25
+178%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−271%
|
26
+271%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−200%
|
15
+200%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−148%
|
55−60
+148%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−243%
|
24
+243%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−200%
|
18−20
+200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−60%
|
8
+60%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−148%
|
55−60
+148%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 30−35 |
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−14.3%
|
16−18
+14.3%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 21−24 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 46
+0%
|
46
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 29
+0%
|
29
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 16
+0%
|
16
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7
+0%
|
7
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 950% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs performs better in 21 tests (39%)
- there's a draw in 33 tests (61%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.01 | 4.28 |
| Recency | 6 February 2002 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 42700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 440 Go in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
