UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs GeForce4 440 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 440 Go and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 440 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms GeForce4 440 Go by a whopping 61700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1536559
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNV17 A5Alder Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores264
Core clock speed220 MHzno data
Boost clock speed220 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate0.88no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount64 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed220 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth7.04 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012_1
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−121
1440p-0−111

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2300%
24
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1400%
15
+1400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
Valorant 24−27
−204%
70−75
+204%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−1263%
100−110
+1263%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1000%
11
+1000%
Dota 2 8−9
−563%
53
+563%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−667%
23
+667%
Valorant 24−27
−204%
70−75
+204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Dota 2 8−9
−513%
49
+513%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−317%
24−27
+317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−267%
11
+267%
Valorant 24−27
+9.1%
22
−9.1%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 35−40

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 16−18

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 25
+0%
25
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 22
+0%
22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
+0%
12
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce4 440 Go is 9% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 3300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce4 440 Go is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is ahead in 25 tests (42%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 6.18
Recency 6 February 2002 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has a 61700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 440 Go in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go
GeForce4 440 Go
Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce4 440 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 490 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 440 Go or UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.