Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce4 440 Go

Place in the ranking	1521	90
Place by popularity	not in top-100	54
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	45.83
Power efficiency	no data	13.15
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	NV17 A5	Navi 10
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 February 2002 (22 years ago)	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	2560
Core clock speed	220 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	220 MHz	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.88	304.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	64
TMUs	4	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	220 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	7.04 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 440 Go 0.01

RX 5700 XT 42.88
+428700%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 440 Go 3

RX 5700 XT 16486
+549433%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	127
1440p	-0−1	76
4K	-0−1	48

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.14
1440p	no data	5.25
4K	no data	8.31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1063%	93 +1063%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −7700%	78 +7700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −850%	76 +850%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −8100%	82 +8100%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −5750%	234 +5750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −3733%	115 +3733%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −700%	64 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −7100%	72 +7100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1040%	57 +1040%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −4725%	193 +4725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −6050%	246 +6050%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −2100%	66 +2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3775%	150−160 +3775%
World of Tanks	8−9 −3388%	270−280 +3388%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −613%	57 +613%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6200%	63 +6200%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1920%	100−110 +1920%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −4175%	171 +4175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −5075%	200−210 +5075%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

0−1

170−180

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −300%	36 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3350%	130−140 +3350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −7600%	75−80 +7600%
Valorant	4−5 −2875%	119 +2875%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −427%	79 +427%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −427%	79 +427%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −427%	79 +427%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Dota 2	14−16 −520%	93 +520%
Valorant	0−1	62

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

133

+0%

133

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	93 +0%	93 +0%
Metro Exodus	156 +0%	156 +0%
Valorant	190 +0%	190 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	194 +0%	194 +0%
Dota 2	127 +0%	127 +0%
Elden Ring	157 +0%	157 +0%
Fortnite	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	145 +0%	145 +0%
Metro Exodus	111 +0%	111 +0%
Valorant	112 +0%	112 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	81 +0%	81 +0%
Dota 2	103 +0%	103 +0%
Valorant	159 +0%	159 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	79 +0%	79 +0%
Elden Ring	88 +0%	88 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	79 +0%	79 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +0%	42 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +0%	80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	119 +0%	119 +0%
Metro Exodus	104 +0%	104 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	28 +0%	28 +0%
Elden Ring	39 +0%	39 +0%
Metro Exodus	35 +0%	35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 +0%	27 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 +0%	52 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Fortnite	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	71 +0%	71 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 8100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is ahead in 29 tests (48%)
there's a draw in 32 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	42.88
Recency	6 February 2002	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	7 nm

RX 5700 XT has a 428700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 440 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 440 Go is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.