Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce4 440 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 440 Go with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 440 Go
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01
RX 5700 XT
2019, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
38.91
+389000%

5700 XT outperforms GeForce4 440 Go by a whopping 389000% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1596133
Place by popularitynot in top-10057
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.40
Power efficiencyno data13.19
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A5Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)7 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores22560
Core clock speed220 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speed220 MHz1905 MHz
Number of transistors29 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate0.88304.8
Floating-point processing powerno data9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4160
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed220 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.04 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 440 Go 0.01
RX 5700 XT 38.91
+389000%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 440 Go 3
Samples: 3
RX 5700 XT 16067
+535467%
Samples: 17656

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1125
1440p-0−176
4K-0−147

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.19
1440pno data5.25
4Kno data8.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 78

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 78
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7650%
155
+7650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2850%
177
+2850%
Valorant 21−24
−1261%
313
+1261%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−3000%
270−280
+3000%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 75
Dota 2 7−8
−1214%
92
+1214%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7600%
154
+7600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2667%
166
+2667%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3750%
154
+3750%
Valorant 21−24
−1178%
294
+1178%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 67
Dota 2 7−8
−1371%
103
+1371%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7300%
148
+7300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2217%
139
+2217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2225%
93
+2225%
Valorant 21−24
−591%
159
+591%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−5150%
105
+5150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 119
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−464%
79
+464%
Valorant 0−1 242

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5200%
53
+5200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 347
+0%
347
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 145
+0%
145
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 308
+0%
308
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 223
+0%
223
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 173
+0%
173
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 177
+0%
177
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 286
+0%
286
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 7650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT performs better in 19 tests (36%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (64%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 38.91
Recency 6 February 2002 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

RX 5700 XT has a 389000% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 440 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 440 Go is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce4 440 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10285 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 440 Go or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.