UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce4 4200 Go
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce4 4200 Go and UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 20800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1586 | 917 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | NV28M | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2002 (23 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 2 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 200 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 10 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 200 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 12_1 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 11 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−73.9%
|
40−45
+73.9%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−378%
|
40−45
+378%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−229%
|
23
+229%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−80%
|
9
+80%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−73.9%
|
40−45
+73.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Dota 2 | 7−8
−214%
|
22
+214%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
−73.9%
|
40−45
+73.9%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 21−24 |
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−7.1%
|
14−16
+7.1%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 10
+0%
|
10
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 17
+0%
|
17
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8
+0%
|
8
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 9
+0%
|
9
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5
+0%
|
5
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7
+0%
|
7
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 450% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) performs better in 20 tests (41%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (59%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.01 | 2.09 |
| Recency | 15 November 2002 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 20800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
