UHD Graphics 730 vs GeForce4 4200 Go

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 4200 Go with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 4200 Go
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

UHD Graphics 730 outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 35800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1539701
Place by popularitynot in top-10097
Power efficiencyno data18.96
Architectureno dataGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV28MRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 November 2002 (22 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6192
Core clock speed2 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed200 MHz1550 MHz
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data18.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 4200 Go 0.01
UHD Graphics 730 3.59
+35800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 4200 Go 3
UHD Graphics 730 1603
+53333%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−35733%
2150−2200
+35733%
Valorant 24−27
−35733%
8600−8650
+35733%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−35525%
2850−2900
+35525%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−35614%
2500−2550
+35614%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−35733%
2150−2200
+35733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−34900%
1050−1100
+34900%
Valorant 24−27
−35733%
8600−8650
+35733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−35614%
2500−2550
+35614%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−35733%
2150−2200
+35733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−34900%
1050−1100
+34900%
Valorant 24−27
−35733%
8600−8650
+35733%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−35567%
5350−5400
+35567%
Valorant 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 3.59
Recency 15 November 2002 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 730 has a 35800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 730 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 4200 Go is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go
GeForce4 4200 Go
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 4200 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1354 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 4200 Go or UHD Graphics 730, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.