ATI Radeon X800 PRO vs GeForce4 4200 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 4200 Go with Radeon X800 PRO, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 4200 Go
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

X800 PRO outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 1400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15961488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.24
Architectureno dataR400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameNV28MR423
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 November 2002 (23 years ago)1 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed2 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed200 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data160 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data48 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.700
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR9.0b (9_2)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 4200 Go 0.01
ATI X800 PRO 0.15
+1400%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 4200 Go 3
Samples: 8
ATI X800 PRO 64
+2033%
Samples: 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
Valorant 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Valorant 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1400%
75−80
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1400%
90−95
+1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Valorant 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1400%
210−220
+1400%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 0.15
Recency 15 November 2002 1 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

ATI X800 PRO has a 1400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon X800 PRO is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 4200 Go is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X800 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go
GeForce4 4200 Go
ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Radeon X800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce4 4200 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 4200 Go or Radeon X800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.