Arc A770 vs GeForce4 4200 Go

Place in the ranking	1519	155
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	55.49
Power efficiency	no data	10.44
Architecture	no data	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	NV28M	DG2-512
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 November 2002 (22 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6	4096
Core clock speed	2 MHz	2100 MHz
Boost clock speed	200 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	614.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	128
TMUs	no data	256
Tensor Cores	no data	512
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	200 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DDR	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 4200 Go 0.01

Arc A770 33.99
+339800%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 4200 Go 3

Arc A770 13085
+436067%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	116
1440p	-0−1	65
4K	-0−1	41

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.84
1440p	no data	5.06
4K	no data	8.02

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−2000%

40−45
+2000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2067%	65 +2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1200%	50−55 +1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1375%	110−120 +1375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2100%	85−90 +2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −275%	100−110 +275%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −933%	31 +933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1200%	50−55 +1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1375%	110−120 +1375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −6350%	258 +6350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −522%	55−60 +522%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −275%	100−110 +275%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1400%	45 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2000%	40−45 +2000%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1200%	50−55 +1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1413%	121 +1413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −5300%	216 +5300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −700%	72 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −164%	74 +164%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	16−18
Hitman 3	6−7 −417%	30−35 +417%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −4900%	100 +4900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2050%

40−45
+2050%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2900%	30 +2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	38

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1000%

21−24
+1000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	92 +0%	92 +0%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 +0%	79 +0%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 +0%	72 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	23 +0%	23 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

+0%

65−70

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +0%	40 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 +0%	60 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	91 +0%	91 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	158 +0%	158 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 +0%	60 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Hitman 3	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	83 +0%	83 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 +0%	73 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8 +0%	8 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	89 +0%	89 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	37 +0%	37 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 6350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Arc A770 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	33.99
Recency	15 November 2002	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	6 nm

Arc A770 has a 339800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 4200 Go is a notebook card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.