UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs GeForce4 420 Go

Place in the ranking	1524	893
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	13.72
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	NV17 A5	Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2002 (22 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	32
Core clock speed	200 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	190 MHz	900 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	no data
ROPs	2	no data
TMUs	4	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

AGP 4x

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	no data
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	200 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	3.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12_1
OpenGL	1.3	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−100%

4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −113%	16−18 +113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −125%	9 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Hitman 3	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +33.3%	6 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −225%	13 +225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +200%	3 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Hitman 3	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −200%	6−7 +200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−50%

3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce4 420 Go is 200% faster.
in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is 225% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce4 420 Go is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 27 tests (53%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	2.00
Recency	6 February 2002	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	150 nm	10 nm

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has a 19900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 420 Go in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.