RTX PRO 6000 vs GeForce4 420 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 420 Go with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 420 Go
2002
32 MB DDR
0.01

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms GeForce4 420 Go by a whopping 65600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1595615
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.84
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNV17 A5GB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores224064
Core clock speed200 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speed190 MHz2407 MHz
Number of transistors29 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rate0.81,810
Floating-point processing powerno data115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs2176
TMUs4752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount32 MB96 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 420 Go 0.01
RTX PRO 6000 6.57
+65600%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 420 Go 3
Samples: 8
RTX PRO 6000 473
+15667%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−64900%
1300−1350
+64900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−64900%
3900−3950
+64900%
Valorant 21−24
−65552%
15100−15150
+65552%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−65456%
5900−5950
+65456%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−64900%
4550−4600
+64900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−64900%
1300−1350
+64900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−64900%
3900−3950
+64900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−64900%
2600−2650
+64900%
Valorant 21−24
−65552%
15100−15150
+65552%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
−64900%
4550−4600
+64900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−64900%
1300−1350
+64900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−64900%
3900−3950
+64900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−64900%
2600−2650
+64900%
Valorant 21−24
−65552%
15100−15150
+65552%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−64900%
1300−1350
+64900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−64900%
650−700
+64900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−65257%
9150−9200
+65257%
Valorant 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−64900%
650−700
+64900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−64900%
650−700
+64900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 6.57
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 96 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 6000 has a 65600% higher aggregate performance score, a 307100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 420 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 420 Go is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce4 420 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 80 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 420 Go or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.