GRID M10-8Q vs GeForce4 420 Go

Place in the ranking	1523	658
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	1.39
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code name	NV17 A5	GM107
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	6 February 2002 (22 years ago)	18 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	640
Core clock speed	200 MHz	1033 MHz
Boost clock speed	190 MHz	1306 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	52.24
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	16
TMUs	4	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	200 MHz	1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth	3.2 GB/s	83.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	-	5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 420 Go 0.01

GRID M10-8Q 4.56
+45500%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 420 Go 3

GRID M10-8Q 1755
+58400%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−44900%

900−950
+44900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −44900%	1350−1400 +44900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −44900%	900−950 +44900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −44900%	900−950 +44900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −44900%	1800−1850 +44900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −44900%	3600−3650 +44900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −44900%	1800−1850 +44900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −45436%	12750−12800 +45436%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −44900%	1350−1400 +44900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −44900%	900−950 +44900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −44900%	900−950 +44900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −44900%	1800−1850 +44900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −44900%	3600−3650 +44900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −44900%	1800−1850 +44900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −45456%	4100−4150 +45456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −45436%	12750−12800 +45436%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −44900%	1350−1400 +44900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −44900%	900−950 +44900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −44900%	900−950 +44900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −44900%	1800−1850 +44900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −44900%	3600−3650 +44900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −44900%	1800−1850 +44900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −45456%	4100−4150 +45456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −45436%	12750−12800 +45436%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −44900%	2700−2750 +44900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −44900%	900−950 +44900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−44900%

900−950
+44900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −44900%	450−500 +44900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−44900%

900−950
+44900%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	4.56
Recency	6 February 2002	18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	28 nm

GRID M10-8Q has a 45500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID M10-8Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 420 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 420 Go is a notebook card while GRID M10-8Q is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.