TITAN RTX vs GeForce2 MX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1585	91
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	6.75
Power efficiency	no data	12.24
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	NV11 A2	TU102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2000 (25 years ago)	18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	4608
Core clock speed	175 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	20 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	180 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	280 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.7	509.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	96
TMUs	4	288
Tensor Cores	no data	576
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	SDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	24 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	166 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	2.656 GB/s	672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	1x VGA	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	7.0	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	1.2	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.5
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	161
1440p	no data	102
4K	no data	73

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	15.52
1440p	no data	24.50
4K	no data	34.23

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	28 June 2000	18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount	32 MB	24 GB
Chip lithography	180 nm	12 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---