RTX A4500 vs GeForce2 Go

Place in the ranking	1567	66
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.38	19.32
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code name	NV11 B2	GA102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	11 November 2000 (24 years ago)	23 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	7168
Core clock speed	143 MHz	1050 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	20 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	180 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2 Watt	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.57	369.6
Floating-point processing power	no data	23.65 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	96
TMUs	4	224
Tensor Cores	no data	224
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	20 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	166 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	5.312 GB/s	640.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	7.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	1.2	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce2 Go 0.01

RTX A4500 50.74
+507300%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce2 Go 4

RTX A4500 21261
+531425%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	50.74
Recency	11 November 2000	23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	20 GB
Chip lithography	180 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2 Watt	200 Watt

GeForce2 Go has 9900% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500, on the other hand, has a 507300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce2 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce2 Go is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 is a workstation one.