RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB outperforms RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 58 | 158 |
| Place by popularity | 54 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 85.19 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 23.01 | 60.23 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | GB206 | GB206 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 April 2025 (less than a year ago) | 19 March 2025 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4608 | 3328 |
| Core clock speed | 2407 MHz | 952 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2572 MHz | 1455 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 21,900 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 370.4 | 151.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 23.7 TFLOPS | 9.684 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 32 |
| TMUs | 144 | 104 |
| Tensor Cores | 144 | 104 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 26 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB | 3.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 241 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| CUDA | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 190−200
+46.2%
| 130
−46.2%
|
| 1440p | 100−110
+44.9%
| 69
−44.9%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 1.99 | no data |
| 1440p | 3.79 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Valorant | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is 46% faster in 1080p
- RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is 45% faster in 1440p
All in all, in popular games:
- there's a draw in 20 tests (100%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 51.34 | 33.59 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 180 Watt | 45 Watt |
RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB has a 52.8% higher aggregate performance score.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has 300% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
