RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs GeForce RTX 5050

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 5050 with RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, including specs and performance data.

RTX 5050
2025
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
38.21

PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF outperforms 5050 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation95.58no data
Power efficiency23.6878.13
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGB207GB203
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date24 June 2025 (less than a year ago)11 August 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25608960
Core clock speed2317 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed2572 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistors16,900 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate205.8374.4
Floating-point processing power13.17 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80280
Tensor Cores80280
Ray Tracing Cores2070
L1 Cache2.5 MB8.8 MB
L2 Cache24 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA12.012.0
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5050 38.21
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 67.89
+77.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5050 16898
Samples: 121
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF 30019
+77.6%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.21 67.89
Recency 24 June 2025 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 70 Watt

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a 77.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 5050 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 5050 is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
GeForce RTX 5050
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 629 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 5050 or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.