Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated17
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.08
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAD104Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release dateno data23 July 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores72804096
Core clock speedno data1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate399.6747.5
Floating-point processing power24.24 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs80128
TMUs240256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB32 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed16 GB/s2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 4080 Ti Mobile has 71.4% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 41 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.