Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameAD106Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084096
Core clock speed735 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1230 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate177.1747.5
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs48128
TMUs144256
Tensor Cores144128
Ray Tracing Cores3664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 4070 Max-Q has 757.1% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 44 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4070 Max-Q or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.