RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4070

Place in the ranking	21	9
Place by popularity	34	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	60.44	no data
Power efficiency	24.13	21.94
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	AD104	AD102
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	12 April 2023 (1 year ago)	9 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5888	12800
Core clock speed	1920 MHz	1155 MHz
Boost clock speed	2475 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	35,800 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	455.4	1,020
Floating-point processing power	29.15 TFLOPS	65.28 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	176
TMUs	184	400
Tensor Cores	184	400
Ray Tracing Cores	46	100

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	240 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	504.2 GB/s	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 67.44

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 76.66
+13.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 26950

RTX 5000 Ada Generation 30636
+13.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	217 −10.6%	240−250 +10.6%
1440p	124 −12.9%	140−150 +12.9%
4K	77 −10.4%	85−90 +10.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.76	no data
1440p	4.83	no data
4K	7.78	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	160−170 −9.1%	180−190 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	216 −11.1%	240−250 +11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −11.1%	130−140 +11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	160−170 −9.1%	180−190 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	87 −9.2%	95−100 +9.2%
Forza Horizon 4	482 −3.7%	500−550 +3.7%
Forza Horizon 5	180−190 −10.5%	200−210 +10.5%
Metro Exodus	174 −9.2%	190−200 +9.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −9.4%	140−150 +9.4%
Valorant	350−400 −12.7%	400−450 +12.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −11.1%	130−140 +11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	160−170 −9.1%	180−190 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	71 −12.7%	80−85 +12.7%
Dota 2	174 −9.2%	190−200 +9.2%
Far Cry 5	156 −9%	170−180 +9%
Fortnite	270−280 −8.7%	300−310 +8.7%
Forza Horizon 4	376 −6.4%	400−450 +6.4%
Forza Horizon 5	180−190 −10.5%	200−210 +10.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	174 −9.2%	190−200 +9.2%
Metro Exodus	149 −7.4%	160−170 +7.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 −11.6%	240−250 +11.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 −9.4%	140−150 +9.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 −9.2%	190−200 +9.2%
Valorant	350−400 −12.7%	400−450 +12.7%
World of Tanks	270−280 −7.5%	300−310 +7.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −11.1%	130−140 +11.1%
Counter-Strike 2	160−170 −9.1%	180−190 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	64 −9.4%	70−75 +9.4%
Far Cry 5	130−140 −13.6%	150−160 +13.6%
Forza Horizon 4	322 −8.7%	350−400 +8.7%
Forza Horizon 5	180−190 −10.5%	200−210 +10.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 −11.6%	240−250 +11.6%
Valorant	350−400 −12.7%	400−450 +12.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −9.4%	35−40 +9.4%
Dota 2	137 −9.5%	150−160 +9.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	137 −9.5%	150−160 +9.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −8.6%	190−200 +8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −11.1%	100−105 +11.1%
World of Tanks	450−500 −11.1%	550−600 +11.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 −9.2%	95−100 +9.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%
Far Cry 5	160−170 −12.5%	180−190 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	222 −12.6%	250−260 +12.6%
Forza Horizon 5	130−140 −11.9%	150−160 +11.9%
Metro Exodus	143 −11.9%	160−170 +11.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 −9%	170−180 +9%
Valorant	300−350 +1.7%	300−310 −1.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%
Dota 2	146 −9.6%	160−170 +9.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	146 −9.6%	160−170 +9.6%
Metro Exodus	65 −7.7%	70−75 +7.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −10%	230−240 +10%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 −6.6%	65−70 +6.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	146 −9.6%	160−170 +9.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 −9.9%	100−105 +9.9%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −13.6%	50−55 +13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −4.8%	110−120 +4.8%
Fortnite	95−100 −4.2%	100−105 +4.2%
Forza Horizon 4	121 −7.4%	130−140 +7.4%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 −13.1%	95−100 +13.1%
Valorant	170−180 −13.6%	200−210 +13.6%

This is how RTX 4070 and RTX 5000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 11% faster in 1080p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 13% faster in 1440p
RTX 5000 Ada Generation is 10% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	67.44	76.66
Recency	12 April 2023	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	32 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	250 Watt

RTX 4070 has 25% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 13.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 4070 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop card while RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.