ATI Radeon 9250 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	44	1547
Place by popularity	100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	63.99	no data
Power efficiency	24.30	no data
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	AD106	RV280
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	1 March 2004 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	no data
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	240 MHz
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	22,900 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	344.8	0.96
Floating-point processing power	22.06 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	136	4
Tensor Cores	136	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	34	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	AGP 8x
Length	240 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	3.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data
Resizable BAR	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	8.1
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	8.9	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	171	no data
1440p	92	no data
4K	55	no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.92	no data
1440p	5.42	no data
4K	9.07	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	18 May 2023	1 March 2004
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	5 nm	150 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---